Registries and Multicentric Studies

Current challenges of registries

Nowadays a shoulder registry exists in the United Kingdom, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Australia, Germany, Portugal, France and the Kaiser Permanente in California.

Existing registries report on surgeon-derived measures, as key-outcome is revision, but there is an increasing demand of all stakeholders for more patient focused outcome measurements. Ideally registries should relate to patient derived outcome measurements as PROMs to enable us to analyze clinical outcome. In several countries the PROMs are already linked to the registry.

Comparative analysis of national registries is difficult as there is a difference in the parameters and outcome measurements recorded. Merging data from different national registries into a common database would enable us to compare incidence, indication, procedure, but also results, and the higher number of cases in such a database would improve the statistical strength of studies. However, this can only be obtained if we agree to use a similar set of variables and outcome measurements.

The Committee

Registries committee (2).png

The Registries and multicentric studies committee aims to :

  • continue to advocate the importance of national joint registries
  • encourage national and international multicentric studies
  • facilitate the set up of both with the ultimate goal to improve medical care


Ongoing studies

[Shoulder] Prosthetic Joint Infection

Registries committee (6).png

Review of the Existing Literature

Templates Website - Registries page (6).png
Cookie Policy